Rod,
Letting go of letting
go is the strangest
thing.
At first, it
doesn't even make sense. Sure,
you can try to let go, but what does it even mean to let go of letting
go? It
seems to be an invitation to stop letting go, and to just continue with
life as
usual. But of course, that misses the point, and when we keep working
with the
idea of letting go of letting go, we get some sense of what it could
be, we
find some sense of handle, some type of traction. We begin to realize
that our
attempts at letting go were not quite complete, and we learn to let go
more. But
in the process, we're still trying to let go. And letting go of the
whole
notion of letting go seems to be the hardest thing to do; no longer
impossible
or inconceivable, but hard, very hard. And then, suddenly, there can be
moments
or situations where we suddenly notice that we've dropped the project
of
letting go, in a refreshing realization that the actual dropping of
letting go
was the easiest thing in the world, a total paradox. And then, before
long, we
find ourselves trying again to let go of letting go, and it becomes
hard again,
as soon as we try. And yet, if we just give up trying, we fall back in
our
usual state of not paying much attention to what's going on. So we try
to be
attentive, yet we try to let go, and we try to let go of letting go.
And we
realize that trying is too much, so we try not to try, and that is too
much
too. It seems hopeless, yet the longer we sit with it, or walk and talk
and
live with it, the more something matures.
I'm writing
this in the `we' rather than
`I' form, since I've heard friends describe similar experiences, and
your
accounts also resonate.
This brings
me to another way of
formulating the working hypothesis: there is nothing to do.
In short: relax. But
I have to smile at such a short summary, because that one is bound to
be
misleading.
A more
positive way of formulating the
working hypothesis would be: everything is wonderful, as is.
In short:
wonder.
Wonder does
not require time or judgment. We
cannot easily make a project out of it.
And there
being no thing is part of what is
wonderful about `everything being wonderful' so the word everything
can be
misleading too; `all is wonderful' may be better.
You see, I'm
still chewing on formulations
of the working hypothesis. I think the idea of working with a
hypothesis rather
than a (blind) belief is a good one, but I haven't found a single
succinct way
of stating it. I can intuit what a good working hypothesis could be,
but I
haven't found the best way of stating it. Do you have any suggestions?
Does
wonder appeal to you?
Piet