Piet's Summary
Thank you all, Rod,
Maria, Nicole, Jake, Miles, and Frank, for participating in this first
cycle of
the WoK Practice Intensive. In the three months that the WoK Experiment has
been running, we've covered a lot of ground, looking at the working
hypothesis
from many different angles. Now that we have doubled the number of volunteers,
and have started a daily form of practice, our explorations no doubt
will move
in new and different directions. I'm excited about all these
developments, and
I'm curious to see what type of terrain we will encounter.
While doing
my lab and
field work, I found it very stimulating to know that six others
were doing the
same type of work, as part of a concerted effort to explore the working
hypothesis. We have borrowed the methodology of the working hypothesis
from
science. Similarly, we are borrowing the scientific notion of a
community of
peers, who compare notes while investigating a shared field of study.
So even
though I have been writing lab and field reports for myself for some
sixteen
years now, with relatively few interruptions, this last week had a
distinctly
fresh flavor, knowing that six friends were sharing the game.
Writing a
weekly
summary is a great challenge. It is easy to write a few hundred words
each
morning in a lab report, and even more in the evening in a field
report, with
the result of winding up with 5,000 to 10,000 words, the size of a
scientific
article of ten to twenty pages, or more. This week, I'll limit myself
to reporting
one useful idea that I got, Friday morning, and that I have been
working with
since.
It occurred
to me that
I could use my breath as a support to balance two ways of looking at
phenomena.
During each inhalation, I would treat all inner and outer phenomena in
the
ordinary way: viewing things around me as solid, treating memories and
anticipations as really pertaining to a time continuum in which I am
situated,
and so on. But during each exhalation, I would view the phenomena as
just forms
of sheer appearance, without focusing on what their seductive pull
would tell
me that they stood for. To take the analogy of a painting, while
inhaling I
would focus on the painting and while exhaling I would focus on the
paint.
I did that
during my
lab practice session, and then also a number of times during the day.
It turned
out to be a rather effective tool, helping me to connect back to the
working
hypothesis, while walking on the street, sometimes even while in the
midst of
busy activities, including talking with others. It had a remarkably
calming and
connecting effect, like spreading oil on the waves of daily activities.
If
anyone else were to try this, I'd be curious to hear whether it was a
useful
trick for him or her too.